I’ve replicated Stiga’s efficiency scores from their web site right into the table listed below, as well as it appears like the Mantro Pro rubber is simply a somewhat slower rubber than the equivalent DNA rubber at each solidity group.
Granted that we take producers’ efficiency scores with a pinch of salt, however nevertheless, Stiga themselves price Mantra Pro as being just fractionally various to DNA: somewhat slower, fractionally more/less spin, as well as a little simpler to regulate.
I’m a little bit puzzled regarding why they would certainly purchase the manufacturing of a new rubber collection that is so minimally various to an existing collection. Is the approach to generate rubbers intended especially at mid- degree gamers (i.e. the majority of us)? Or possibly the DNA Pro collection isn’t offering well as well as they prepare to phase it out as well as change it with Mantra Pro which, possibly, is less expensive to produce?
I have comparable inquiries regarding Xiom’s J&H collection. I do not actually recognize where it suits connection to the Omega 7 collection. This is one location in which Butterfly does much better than any type of various other: their item array is a lot easier to recognize.
|Mantra Pro M (47 )||148||135||82|
|DNA Pro M (47.5 )||156||134||78|
|DNA Platinum M (47.5 )||160||140||76|
|Mantra Pro H (50 )||152||135||80|
|DNA Platinum H (50 )||164||140||74|
|Mantra Pro XH (53 )||156||135||78|
|DNA Pro H (52.5 )||160||134||76|
|DNA Platinum XH (52.5 )||168||140||72|
Leave a Reply